«The EU has passed a law allowing companies to conduct mass surveillance on private messages and emails despite the majority of parliament voting against it.» This is how Pubity summarized it in 2026, in a post that exceeded 32,000 views: the controversial extension of Chat Control, the regime that allows platforms to scan private messages in search of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — and which came back into force because the European Parliament did not gather the absolute majority necessary to overturn it.
What exactly happened in Strasbourg
On Thursday, July 9, MEPs voted on a motion to reject the extension of the temporary repeal of the ePrivacy Directive, known as Chat Control 1.0 (Regulation (EU) 2021/1232). The count, collected by media such as Patrick Breyer, TechTimes and Reclaim The Net:
- 314 votes to reject the extension (block scanning)
- 276 in favor of maintaining it
- 17 abstentions
In terms of attendees who voted, more MEPs wanted to stop the measure than support it. But the second reading procedure requires an absolute majority of 361 of Parliament's 720 seats – including absentees – to reject the Council's position. The 314 fell 47 votes short, and the extension continued.
The EU has passed a law allowing companies to conduct mass surveillance on private messages and emails despite the majority of parliament voting against it. Chat Control will now be in place until at least April 9, 2028.
Editorial note: parliamentary sources and Brussels Signal place the end of the extension on April 3, 2028, not 9. The standard allows voluntary scanning — not mandatory for all companies — and focuses on already identified CSAM, not general reading of conversations.
From March to July: the norm that "died" and was revived
In March 2026, Parliament had rejected an extension with 311 votes against — a simple majority sufficient then. The temporary rule expired April 3-4. The EU Council adopted a new second reading position on July 2 and, after an emergency procedure on July 8 (331 in favor, 304 against), the final vote was set for the last day of the plenary session before the summer recess — when many MEPs had already left Strasbourg, according to analysts cited by Reclaim The Net.
| Frame | What it allows | What it doesn't do |
|---|---|---|
| Chat Control 1.0 (extended) | Voluntary scanning for known CSAM in unencrypted chats/mails | Does not bind all platforms; does not open direct access to governments |
| Chat Control 2.0 (in negotiation) | Permanent regulation of online child sexual abuse | Still no agreement; debate on end-to-end encryption (E2EE) |
Video: European Parliament vote on Chat Control
Coverage of the parliamentary vote on the extension of Chat Control. Source: EU Parliament Vote On Chat Control (YouTube)
Platforms affected and privacy criticism
According to Patrick Breyer and Cryptopolitan, the framework once again authorizes large American technology companies to scan direct messages in services such as Instagram, Discord, Snapchat, Skype, Xbox, in addition to emails in Gmail and storage in iCloud — without a court order or prior individual suspicion.
Critics like Breyer — and the EU Council's own legal service, according to TechTimes — warn of incompatibility with article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (privacy). A Parliamentary study concluded that mass screening leads to high false positives; The German BKA estimates that almost half of alerts are not criminally relevant.
In the same session, Parliament approved an amendment to exclude services with end-to-end encryption (E2EE) from the regime — WhatsApp, Signal, etc. That amendment must return to the Council before October 2026. Negotiations on the permanent regulation (Chat Control 2.0) resume in September.
Mass surveillance or child protection?
Brussels frames the measure as a fight against CSAM; Digital activists call it indiscriminate surveillance. What is clear after July 9: the voluntary scanning of private communications in the EU has a legal basis until 2028, approved by a mechanism in which whoever did not reach a simple majority against won — exactly the headline that went viral Pubity and that divides jurists, companies and European citizens.
Most read
What readers are engaging with right now.
- Culture
Goose, the gay app that competes with Grindr, reaches the top 4 of Lifestyle in the App Store

- Culture
Harry Potter on HBO: complete guide to the series (not yet released and already renewed for T2), dates, cast and controversies

- Culture
DUK App: Aly Sánchez launches her habits app "one day at a time" with a 63-day program

- Culture
I'm Edgy and Edgy Labs: From Nebraska's Walmart to a beef tallow cream brand that sells across the US.

- World
El Cangrejo: profile of Raúl Guillermo Rodríguez Castro, Raúl Castro's grandson between GAESA, leaked luxuries and the first interview of 2026

- World
Cuban regime terrorist Ramiro Valdés Menéndez dies

- Culture
House of the Dragon S3 has already premiered: first chapter available on HBO Max after the start of June 21

- World
Supreme Court, June 23, 2026: analysis of Tuesday's 5 rulings (and what each one implies)

- World
Breaking news: 7.5 magnitude earthquake shakes Venezuela — damage in Caracas, La Guaira and Maiquetía airport
